Jim, I put this together for you as a reference guide you can come back to anytime. We go back and forth on a lot of these concepts on the phone, and I think having the math laid out on paper will help connect some of the dots between the strategies. Each section builds on the one before it, and I kept the examples to names you already know. Take your time with it, and if anything does not click, we will walk through it together on a call.
1 What Is an Option?
Let's start with a quick recap of the basics here, just to make sure we are on the same page with the definitions before we get into the strategy side.
Each contract covers 100 shares. So when we say "sold a put for $2," that means $2 per share, or $200 per contract. All the examples in this report are shown per share.
2 How an Option's Price Breaks Down
This is where everything starts. If you understand this section, the rest of the guide clicks into place. Every option price on your screen is made up of two pieces. Knowing which piece is which changes how you evaluate every trade we do.
Intrinsic Value
Intrinsic value answers one question: if this option were exercised right now, what would it be worth?
For a call: Stock Price minus Strike. If negative, intrinsic is zero.
For a put: Strike minus Stock Price. If negative, intrinsic is zero.
When an option has intrinsic value, it is "in the money" (ITM). When it has none, it is "out of the money" (OTM).
Simple Example: ORCL at $140
Let's look at four options and see which ones have intrinsic value and which do not:
| Option | Strike vs. Stock | Intrinsic Value | ITM or OTM? | Plain English |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $130 Call | Strike is below stock | $10 ($140 − $130) | IN the Money | You could exercise and buy ORCL at $130, sell at $140, pocket $10. That $10 is real value right now. |
| $150 Call | Strike is above stock | $0 | OUT of the Money | Why would you exercise and buy ORCL at $150 when it is trading at $140? You would not. So intrinsic is zero. |
| $150 Put | Strike is above stock | $10 ($150 − $140) | IN the Money | You could exercise and sell ORCL at $150 when it is only worth $140. That $10 difference is real value. |
| $130 Put | Strike is below stock | $0 | OUT of the Money | Why sell ORCL at $130 when it is worth $140? You would not. Intrinsic is zero. |
Now Add Time Value
Let's say both of those in the money options are trading for more than just their intrinsic value. The difference is TMV:
| Option | Market Price | Intrinsic | Time Value (TMV) | What This Means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $130 Call (ITM) | $14 | $10 | $4 | $10 of the price is real value right now. The other $4 is time premium that will decay to zero by expiration. |
| $150 Call (OTM) | $2 | $0 | $2 | Zero intrinsic. The entire $2 is time premium. If ORCL does not get above $150, this option expires worthless. |
| $150 Put (ITM) | $14 | $10 | $4 | $10 is real value. $4 is time premium. |
| $130 Put (OTM) | $2 | $0 | $2 | Zero intrinsic. All $2 is time premium. Expires worthless if ORCL stays above $130. |
Time Value (TMV)
Time value is everything in the price that is not intrinsic. You will sometimes hear it called "extrinsic value." Time value and extrinsic value mean the exact same thing.
TMV exists because there is still time on the clock. More time = more TMV. As each day passes, TMV shrinks. On expiration day, TMV is exactly zero. That daily decay is what works in our favor every time we sell an option.
A Simple Example Before We Hit the Tables
Say ORCL is trading at $140 and you are looking at the $130 call, which is priced at $14.
Start with intrinsic. The stock is at $140 and the call lets you buy at $130. That is $10 of real value right now. You could exercise, buy at $130, and immediately sell at $140 for a $10 gain. So intrinsic value = $10.
But the option is not priced at $10. It is priced at $14. Where does the extra $4 come from? That is the time value. There is still time left before expiration, and during that time ORCL could go higher, which would make the option worth even more. Traders pay a premium for that possibility. So time value (TMV) = $4.
On expiration day, that $4 of TMV will be gone. The option will be worth exactly its intrinsic value and nothing more. As sellers, we want that $4 to melt away in our favor. That is the entire concept behind premium selling.
Now Let's See It Across a Full Chain: MSFT at $400
Here are six options on MSFT at different strikes, all with the same expiration. Watch how intrinsic and TMV change depending on whether the option is in the money or out of the money:
| Option | ITM / OTM | Option Price | Intrinsic | TMV | Step by Step (MSFT is at $400) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $380 Call | ITM by $20 | $26 | $20 | $6 | Call lets you buy at $380, stock is at $400. That is $20 of real value right now (intrinsic). Option costs $26, so the other $6 is time value. $26 price − $20 intrinsic = $6 TMV |
| $380 Put | OTM by $20 | $6 | $0 | $6 | Put lets you sell at $380, but stock is at $400. Why sell at $380 when it is worth $400? You would not. So intrinsic is $0. The entire $6 price is time value. $6 price − $0 intrinsic = $6 TMV |
| $400 Call | ATM | $12 | $0 | $12 | Call lets you buy at $400, stock is at $400. No advantage to exercising. Intrinsic is $0. The entire $12 is time value. $12 price − $0 intrinsic = $12 TMV |
| $400 Put | ATM | $12 | $0 | $12 | Put lets you sell at $400, stock is at $400. No advantage. Intrinsic is $0. The entire $12 is time value. $12 price − $0 intrinsic = $12 TMV |
| $420 Call | OTM by $20 | $3.50 | $0 | $3.50 | Call lets you buy at $420, but stock is only $400. Why buy at $420 when it is worth $400? You would not. Intrinsic is $0. All $3.50 is time value. $3.50 price − $0 intrinsic = $3.50 TMV |
| $420 Put | ITM by $20 | $23.50 | $20 | $3.50 | Put lets you sell at $420, stock is only worth $400. That is $20 of real value right now (intrinsic). Option costs $23.50, so the other $3.50 is time value. $23.50 price − $20 intrinsic = $3.50 TMV |
3 The Covered Call
This is one of the two core strategies. You already know how this works, but I want to lay out the math so we can compare it side by side with the put in the next section.
You own 100 shares and sell a call against them. You collect premium today. If the stock rises above the strike, your shares get called away.
Example: Own ADBE at $300. Sell the $300 Call for $10.
The call is at the money, so the entire $10 is time value.
| ADBE at Expiration | Stock P&L | Call Outcome | Total P&L |
|---|---|---|---|
| $270 | −$30 | Call expires. Keep $10. | −$20 |
| $280 | −$20 | Call expires. Keep $10. | −$10 |
| $290 | −$10 | Call expires. Keep $10. | $0 (Break Even) |
| $295 | −$5 | Call expires. Keep $10. | +$5 |
| $300 | $0 | Called away. Keep $10. | +$10 (Max) |
| $310 | Would be +$10 | Called away at $300. | +$10 (Capped) |
| $320 | Would be +$20 | Called away at $300. | +$10 (Capped) |
Payoff Profile: Covered Call
4 The Cash Secured Put
Now here is the same trade, but on the put side. Same stock, same strike, same expiration. Watch how every single number comes out the same.
Example: ADBE at $300. Sell the $300 Put for $10.
| ADBE at Expiration | Put Outcome | Total P&L |
|---|---|---|
| $270 | Assigned at $300, worth $270. $30 loss minus $10 premium. | −$20 |
| $280 | Assigned. $20 loss minus $10. | −$10 |
| $290 | Assigned. $10 loss minus $10. | $0 (Break Even) |
| $295 | Assigned. $5 loss minus $10. | +$5 |
| $300 | Put expires. Keep $10. | +$10 (Max) |
| $310 | Put expires. Keep $10. | +$10 (Capped) |
| $320 | Put expires. Keep $10. | +$10 (Capped) |
Payoff Profile: Cash Secured Put
Same break even ($290). Same max profit ($10). Same loss at every level. The covered call and the cash secured put at the same strike are the same trade. The TMV you collect is the same on both sides.
5 Put Call Parity
This is the law that makes everything in Sections 3 and 4 true, and it is the reason I keep saying "selling a put IS a covered call." Here is the proof.
Line by Line Proof: MSFT at $400, $400 Strike
Let's go back to the MSFT chain from Section 2. Remember, MSFT is at $400 and the $400 call and the $400 put are both priced at $12 (both at the money, so all $12 is TMV on each side). Now let's compare what happens if you sell the covered call versus the cash secured put:
Covered call: Buy MSFT at $400, sell the $400 call for $12.
Cash secured put: Sell the $400 put for $12.
| MSFT at Exp. | Covered Call P&L | Cash Secured Put P&L | |
|---|---|---|---|
| $370 | Stock loses $30. Keep $12 call premium. $30 loss + $12 = −$18 | = | Assigned at $400, worth $370. $30 loss. Keep $12 put premium. $30 loss + $12 = −$18 |
| $380 | Stock loses $20. Keep $12. = −$8 | = | Assigned, $20 loss. Keep $12. = −$8 |
| $388 | Stock loses $12. Keep $12. = $0 (B/E) | = | Assigned, $12 loss. Keep $12. = $0 (B/E) |
| $400 | Called away at $400. No stock gain or loss. Keep $12. = +$12 | = | Put expires at the money. Keep $12. = +$12 |
| $420 | Called away at $400 (capped). Keep $12. = +$12 | = | Put expires worthless. Keep $12. = +$12 |
Every row matches. The $12 you collect is the same $12 of TMV on both sides (from the chain in Section 2). This is not a coincidence. It is a mathematical law. If it ever did not hold, professional traders would exploit the gap instantly and push it back into line.
6 ITM Covered Call vs. Short Put: Same Strike
Here is where it gets interesting. We are used to selling OTM or ATM options. But what happens when you sell an in the money covered call? Let's compare it to the put at the same strike and see what happens.
Let's go back to the MSFT at $400 chain from Section 2. Look at the $380 row. The $380 call was $26 ($20 intrinsic + $6 TMV). The $380 put was $6 ($0 intrinsic + $6 TMV). Both had $6 of TMV.
Trade A: Own MSFT at $400. Sell the ITM $380 Call for $26.
This call is $20 in the money (stock $400 minus $380 strike = $20). So $20 of the $26 is intrinsic. Only $6 is TMV.
Trade B: Sell the OTM $380 Put for $6.
This put is $20 out of the money. Zero intrinsic. All $6 is TMV.
Here is the P&L side by side. Pay attention to what happens when the stock drops below the $380 strike. On the call side, the call expires worthless (the buyer will not exercise the right to buy at $380 when the stock is cheaper), but you still hold the stock and its losses. On the put side, you get assigned and buy the stock at $380. Either way, same outcome.
| MSFT at Exp. | ITM Covered Call Own stock $400 + Sell $380 Call for $26 | Short Put Sell $380 Put for $6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| $360 | Stock drops from $400 to $360 = $40 loss. Call expires worthless (stock below $380, buyer will not exercise). Keep $26. −$40 + $26 = −$14 | = | Assigned: buy at $380, worth $360 = $20 loss. Keep $6. −$20 + $6 = −$14 |
| $370 | Stock drops $30. Call expires. Keep $26. −$30 + $26 = −$4 | = | Assigned: −$10 + $6 = −$4 |
| $374 | Stock drops $26. Call expires. Keep $26. −$26 + $26 = $0 B/E | = | Assigned: −$6 + $6 = $0 B/E |
| $380 | Stock drops $20. Called away at $380. −$20 + $26 = +$6 | = | Put expires at the money. Keep $6 = +$6 |
| $400 | Stock flat. Called away at $380. −$20 + $26 = +$6 (capped) | = | Put expires. Keep $6 = +$6 |
| $420 | Stock up $20 but called away at $380. −$20 + $26 = +$6 (capped) | = | Put expires. Keep $6 = +$6 |
7 Deep ITM Put vs. OTM Covered Call
Now let's flip it. What if you sell a deep in the money put instead? The premium number looks huge, and it feels like you are getting a great deal. But once you break it down, the real income is the same as selling a far out of the money call. Same exact concept, just the other direction.
MSFT at $400. Sell the Deep ITM $420 Put for $23.50.
This put is $20 in the money. $20 is intrinsic, only $3.50 is TMV.
Compare: Own MSFT at $400, Sell the OTM $420 Call for $3.50.
This call is $20 out of the money. $0 intrinsic, $3.50 TMV.
| MSFT at Exp. | Deep ITM Put ($23.50) | OTM Covered Call ($3.50) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| $380 | Assigned: −$40 + $23.50 = −$16.50 | = | Stock −$20 + $3.50 = −$16.50 |
| $400 | Assigned: −$20 + $23.50 = +$3.50 | = | Stock flat + $3.50 = +$3.50 |
| $420 | Expires. Keep $23.50 = +$23.50 | = | Called away: +$20 + $3.50 = +$23.50 |
| $440 | Expires = +$23.50 | = | Called away = +$23.50 (capped) |
8 Beyond Expiry: Rolling a Put vs. Getting Assigned and Selling a Call
This is where everything we have covered comes together in one scenario. I want to walk you through what happens when a put is in the money at expiration and we have to decide what to do next. There are two paths, and both lead to the same place.
The Setup
Say ORCL is at $148 and you sell a $145 put for $2 with 30 days until expiration. Three weeks go by. ORCL drops to $138. Your $145 put is now $7 in the money. Expiration is Friday.
Path A: Roll the Put to a New Expiration
Path B: Get Assigned, Take the Stock, Sell a Covered Call
30 Days Later: Where Does Each Path End Up?
| ORCL 30 Days Later | Path A: Rolled the Put | Path B: Stock + Call | |
|---|---|---|---|
| $125 | Assigned at $145: −$20 + $10 = −$10 | = | Stock from $145 to $125: −$20 + $3 = −$10 (net) |
| $130 | −$15 + $10 = −$5 | = | −$15 + $3 = −$5 (net) |
| $138 | −$7 + $10 = +$3 | = | Flat + $3 = +$3 |
| $145 | Expires. Keep $10 = +$10 | = | Called away: $0 + $3. Net = +$10 |
| $155 | Expires OTM = +$10 | = | Called away: capped = +$10 |
Same result at every price. The $145 put and the $145 call both have $3 of TMV with 30 days left (parity). Whether you stay in the put or switch to stock plus the call, you end up in the same place.
9 How Buying Back an Option for a Loss Raises Your Cost Basis
This is one that comes up a lot. When you buy an option back for more than you sold it for, that loss does not just disappear. It adds to your effective cost basis on the overall position. Let me show you the math.
Example: ORCL Put Sequence
ORCL drops. The put is now worth $8. You buy it back.
That $6 loss is real. It is gone. Now you sell a new put:
This is the same thing as if you had been assigned on the original put at $143 and the stock dropped $8. Your stock would be at $135, you would be down $8, and your cost basis would still be $143. The loss happened on the stock instead of the option, but the economics are the same.
10 Where the Stock Goes Changes Everything
When you sell an option and collect premium, that cash is in your account immediately. But it is not profit yet. Think of it like a deposit. You do not know the final P&L until you see where the stock ends up. Let me show you three different outcomes on the same trade.
Example: ORCL at $148. Sell $145 Put for $2.
| Where ORCL Goes | What Happens | Your P&L | Was the $2 "Profit"? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario 1: ORCL goes to $150 | Put expires worthless. You keep $2. | +$2.00 | Yes. Trade is over. |
| Scenario 2: ORCL stays at $145 | Put expires at the money. You keep $2. | +$2.00 | Yes. Just barely. |
| Scenario 3: ORCL drops to $138 | Assigned at $145. Stock worth $138. Lost $7, kept $2. | −$5.00 | No. $2 did not cover the $7 drop. |
| Scenario 4: ORCL drops to $130 | Assigned at $145. Stock worth $130. Lost $15, kept $2. | −$13.00 | No. $2 against a $15 loss. |
The $2 is real cash in your account, but the stock can move a lot more than $2. Where the stock ends up is what determines whether you actually profit. The premium is just one piece of a larger equation.
11 Credit Rolls: Why a "Credit" Can Be a Loss
This is one of the trickiest concepts in options, and it is something we have discussed before. A "credit" on a roll means you collected more on the new option than you paid to close the old one. That sounds positive. But you have to look at the running total going all the way back to the first trade.
The Real ORCL Trade Sequence
Let me walk through this one step at a time with exact numbers so nothing gets lost.
| # | What Happened | Option Price | Cash In/Out | Running Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ORCL near $146. Sell $145 put. | Sold at $1.00 | +$1.00 | +$1.00 |
| 2 | ORCL drops. Buy back $145 put. | Bought at $5.20 | −$5.20 | −$4.20 |
| Loss on the first put: sold for $1.00, closed for $5.20. That is a $4.20 realized loss. This loss is real and it is locked in. | ||||
| 3 | Sell new $145 put (same strike, longer dated). | Sold at $7.00 | +$7.00 | +$2.80 |
| The roll (trades 2+3) was done for a "$1.80 credit" ($7.00 minus $5.20). But the loss on the first put was $4.20. The $1.80 credit did not erase the $4.20 loss. Running total is only +$2.80, not +$8.00. | ||||
Now the question comes up: ORCL is still around $138. The $145 put is trading at $7. The idea is to buy it back for $7, then sell the $135 put for $3.50, lowering the strike. Let's see what happens to the running total:
| # | Proposed Action | Option Price | Cash In/Out | Running Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying forward from above | +$2.80 | |||
| 4 | Buy back $145 put. | Buy at $7.00 | −$7.00 | −$4.20 |
| 5 | Sell $135 put. | Sell at $3.50 | +$3.50 | −$0.70 |
| NET AFTER ALL 5 TRADES | −$0.70 |
The thinking is: "I sold for $7, bought back for $7, that is break even. Then I sold the $135 for $3.50, so I am ahead $3.50." But that skips the $4.20 loss that was locked in at trades 1 and 2. That loss is real. It happened. You cannot erase it by breaking even on the next leg.
After all 5 trades, the running total is −$0.70, and you are still short a $135 put (still have an open obligation).
12 Rolling the Strike Down for a Debit: The Hidden Loss
Jim, this is the most important section in this entire report. This is what we were going back and forth on. I want to walk you through exactly why rolling the put from the $145 down to the $135 for a debit is the same thing as getting assigned on the stock and selling a $135 covered call. The debit you pay IS the loss you are locking in. Same dollars. Let me show you.
The Situation
This picks up right where Section 11 left off. After trades 1 through 3 (sold the $145 put for $1, bought back for $5.20, sold a new $145 put for $7), the $145 put is now trading at $7 with ORCL around $138. The idea is to buy the $145 put back for $7 and roll down to the $135 put for $3.50.
The Roll Math
You paid $3.50 out of pocket to lower the strike from $145 to $135. That $3.50 is real money leaving your account. Now here is the question: what does that $3.50 actually represent?
Convert It to the Covered Call Version
Instead of rolling the put down, imagine you got assigned on the $145 put (you buy the stock at $145) and then sold a $135 covered call. Let's walk through both side by side.
What You Did: Rolled the Put Down
Buy back $145 put: −$7.00
Sell $135 put: +$3.50
Cost: $3.50 debit
You lowered the strike by $10 and it cost you $3.50.
The Equivalent: Assigned + Sell $135 Call
Assigned on $145 put: you now own ORCL at $145.
Sell the $135 call for $6.50.
Why $6.50? ORCL is at $138. The $135 call has $3 of intrinsic ($138 minus $135) plus $3.50 of TMV. The TMV on the $135 call is the same $3.50 as the TMV on the $135 put (put call parity).
If called away at $135:
You bought stock at $145, sold at $135 = −$10 stock loss
Call premium collected = +$6.50
Net loss if called away: −$3.50
When you roll the put from $145 down to $135 and pay a $3.50 debit, you are doing the same thing as buying the stock at $145 and agreeing to sell it at $135. That is a $10 loss on the stock, partially offset by the $6.50 call premium, netting out to a $3.50 loss. The debit IS the locked in loss.
The Question to Ask Yourself
That means agreeing to sell the stock at $135, which is $10 below your cost. Even with the $6.50 call premium, your best case outcome is a $3.50 loss. You can never make money on that trade. The call caps you at $135 and your cost is $145.
Most people would say no. You would not sell a call $10 below your cost basis because it locks in a guaranteed loss. But rolling the put from $145 down to $135 for a $3.50 debit is that exact same trade. Different packaging, same economics, same $3.50 loss.
13 When to Sell Calls: Stock Low vs. Stock High
This ties directly into everything above. How you manage calls depends entirely on where the stock is relative to your cost. These are two very different situations that require opposite approaches.
Stock Below Your Cost Basis
Say you own HD at $370 and it drops to $340. You are down $30.
Bad: Sell $350 Call, 60 Days, $6
If HD recovers to $365: called away at $350.
Stock loss: −$20. Call: +$6.
Net: −$14.
You capped your recovery for $6.
Better: Sell $375 Call, 2 Weeks, $0.50
Far OTM, short dated.
Only called away above $375.
Small income, recovery preserved.
Or sell nothing at all.
Stock Above Your Cost Basis
Say you own AMZN at $185 and it is now $215. You are up $30.
Good: Sell $215 Call, 30 Days, $6
Called away: $30 stock gain + $6 = +$36.
Getting called away is a win.
Bad: Sell $230 Call, 6 Months, $8
Tied up 6 months.
If stock drops to $185, $8 against $30 loss of gains.
Take the profit when it is there.
14 How We Manage Positions
These are the principles that drive every decision we make on option positions. This is how I think about it every day.
1. Let Time Value Decay. Do Not Pay It Back.
When we sell an option, we collect TMV. The goal is to let that TMV decay to zero. We generally do not buy options back early because every dollar of TMV you return is a dollar less in your pocket.
2. Close Early Only When It Makes Sense
| Close Early When... | Why |
|---|---|
| Almost no TMV is left | The option is down to $0.05 or $0.10. There is nothing left to earn. Close, free collateral, redeploy. |
| A roll offers higher daily TMV | Current trade: $0.50 TMV over 15 days = $0.03/day. New trade: $3 over 30 days = $0.10/day. The roll triples daily income. Worth paying back the $0.50. |
3. Track the Full P&L Chain
Every roll is part of a chain going back to trade one. The running total is the only number that matters.
4. The Covered Call Sanity Check
"If I owned this stock at my total effective cost right now, would I sell a covered call at this strike?"
If yes: the trade makes sense.
If no: the trade is locking in a loss, regardless of how the premium looks.
15 Summary
| # | Rule | In Plain English |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Option Price = Intrinsic + TMV | Intrinsic is what it is worth now. TMV is the time premium that decays to zero. |
| 2 | Call TMV = Put TMV | At the same strike and expiration, the income is identical on both sides. |
| 3 | Covered call = Cash secured put | Same payoff. Same P&L. They are the same trade. |
| 4 | ITM call = OTM put (and vice versa) | Big premium does not mean more income. The TMV is the same. |
| 5 | Rolling a put = Assignment + Covered call | Same position, different paperwork. |
| 6 | Buying back for a loss raises cost basis | Every dollar lost on a buyback adds a dollar to your effective cost. |
| 7 | Premium collected is not profit | Where the stock goes determines whether you actually make money. |
| 8 | Credit rolls can be losses | Always look at the running total from trade one. |
| 9 | Rolling down for a debit = Locked in loss | The debit is the same $ you would lose getting called away below cost. |
| 10 | Do not pay TMV back | Unless the option is nearly worthless or a roll offers better daily TMV. |
| 11 | Stock below cost: far OTM, short dated, or nothing | Do not cap your recovery. |
| 12 | Stock above cost: get called away | Called away at a profit is a win. Take it. |
Jim, I hope this helps put some of these concepts on paper in a way that clicks. We have been doing this for a while together and I know you understand the strategies intuitively. Sometimes seeing the math written out connects the dots in a different way. If any section does not make sense or you want to work through a specific trade, give me a call and we will go through it together.
Best,
Brandon